Here is the email:
Dear Colleague,
I am writing to invite you to join me, 27 Nobel Laureate economists, 3 other former Chairs of the Federal Reserve and 15 former Chairs of the Council of Economic Advisers as a signatory of the Economists’ Statement that you will find below. Our statement was released today on the opinion page of the Wall Street Journal. A full list of the original co-signatories appears below.
This statement outlines what we believe is the most cost-effective, equitable and politically-viable national climate solution. Now more than ever, it is critical for economists to point the way forward and coalesce around a bipartisan climate policy.
Our goal is to enlist thousands of economists from around the country as additional signatories to demonstrate the breadth of support within the economics profession for this market-based solution. I encourage you to join by clicking the link below.
f you wish to sign on, please do so at your earliest convenience. Also please feel free to share this invitation with your colleagues in the economics profession. Once we have sufficient signatures, a final version of the statement will be posted online, including the names of all signatories.
This effort is being coordinated by the Climate Leadership Council, of which original co-signatories Ben Bernanke, Martin Feldstein, N. Gregory Mankiw, George Shultz, Lawrence Summers and I are Founding Members. Any questions can be directed to [email protected].
Thank you for seriously considering this invitation.
Janet Yellen
Here is the statement:
Economists' Statement on Carbon Dividends
Global climate change is a serious problem calling for immediate national action. Guided by sound economic principles, we are united in the following policy recommendations.
I. A carbon tax offers the most cost-effective lever to reduce carbon emissions at the scale and speed that is necessary. By correcting a well-known market failure, a carbon tax will send a powerful price signal that harnesses the invisible hand of the marketplace to steer economic actors towards a low-carbon future.
II. A carbon tax should increase every year until emissions reductions goals are met and be revenue neutral to avoid debates over the size of government. A consistently rising carbon price will encourage technological innovation and large-scale infrastructure development. It will also accelerate the diffusion of carbon-efficient goods and services.
III. A sufficiently robust and gradually rising carbon tax will replace the need for various carbon regulations that are less efficient. Substituting a price signal for cumbersome regulations will promote economic growth and provide the regulatory certainty companies need for long-term investment in clean-energy alternatives.
IV. To prevent carbon leakage and to protect U.S. competitiveness, a border carbon adjustment system should be established. This system would enhance the competitiveness of American firms that are more energy-efficient than their global competitors. It would also create an incentive for other nations to adopt similar carbon pricing.
V. To maximize the fairness and political viability of a rising carbon tax, all the revenue should be returned directly to U.S. citizens through equal lump-sum rebates. The majority of American families, including the most vulnerable, will benefit financially by receiving more in “carbon dividends” than they pay in increased energy prices.
One might quibble with different parts of this but don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Here is the link where you can sign: https://www.econstatement.org/sign-the-statement (I think this will work ...).
