From Referee #2:
Unfortunately, I find the exposition of the paper rather to be substantially weaker than I would expect for an article of this type at any journal .... I found several aspects of the process for how the survey questions were assigned or presented to respondents, and how the analysis was conducted and interpreted, to be either opaque or at least sloppy in explanation. I would normally consider it a minor comment, but I also found the failure to use commas in a myriad of numerous instances (redundancy for emphasis) to contribute to a frustrating read, as well as occasional failures to recognize that the noun associated with a verb in the sentence (especially a second verb, such as following the word “and”) could not be relaying the meaning that the authors intended.
Guess the rejected paper based on this comment and I'll buy you a beer.
