I just sent this in an email:
The data files have the *.ssd extension. My version of SAS is saying that this is not a SAS data set but I think it is from an older version. Can you give me any help in opening this?
Any help out there?
« Job Announcement: sustainable economics and community development at Appstate | Main | Fighting Lazy Hausman Cites »
September 25, 2013
A question for the SAS users (if there are any left)
Posted by John Whitehead on September 25, 2013 at 04:53 PM in Research | Permalink
Comments
Info
Who Knows What Willingness to Pay Lurks in the Hearts of Men? A Rejoinder to Egan, Corrigan, and Dwyer
by John C. Whitehead, Econ Journal Watch, 14(3): 346–361, September 2017
Buy our books :)
August 2021
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 |
Tietenberg and Lewis, 11th edition
Anderson, 5th edition
Recent Comments
- tüpçü on Stand-up economist: Grading Economics Textbooks on Climate Change
- fethiye otel on Pragmatic and existential concerns about the social cost of carbon
- kürtaj on ECON 101: Negative Externality
- fethiye villa on Stand-up economist: Grading Economics Textbooks on Climate Change
- kürtaj edirne on ECON 101: Negative Externality
- kürtaj edirne on Stand-up economist: Grading Economics Textbooks on Climate Change
- Rosa Coriell on Stand-up economist: Grading Economics Textbooks on Climate Change
- Vancouver Mason on Stand-up economist: Grading Economics Textbooks on Climate Change
- kissanime ru on Reply to "Reply to Whitehead" by Desvousges, Mathews and Train (an introduction)
- Joana on Stand-up economist: Grading Economics Textbooks on Climate Change
Rankings
"This blog aims to look at more of the microeconomic ideas that can be used toward environmental ends. Bringing to bear a large quantity of external sources and articles, this blog presents a clear vision of what economic environmentalism can be."
Categories
- Agriculture (74)
- Air Quality (195)
- Answer Desk (28)
- Attempt at humor (231)
- Beer (46)
- Benefit-cost analysis (303)
- Book Reviews (52)
- Books (42)
- Cap-and-Trade (32)
- Cap-and-Trade Watch (316)
- Carbon Tax (133)
- Climate Change (1467)
- Coastal management (132)
- Contingent valuation (43)
- Contributors (130)
- Current Affairs (47)
- Deepwater Horizon blowout (41)
- Demand and Supply (151)
- Dubious to hopeless (22)
- Ecological Economics (59)
- Econometrics (12)
- Ecosystem Services (9)
- Energy Resources (1148)
- Film (2)
- Fishery Resources (400)
- Food and Drink (252)
- Forestry Resources (98)
- Games (3)
- Gas Tax (30)
- Government Policy (866)
- Guest Post (49)
- Health Effects (100)
- Humor (337)
- Just Because (94)
- Kahn (14)
- Land Resources (123)
- Macroeconomics (350)
- Marine Resources (103)
- Microeconomics (302)
- Movies (20)
- Murder (1)
- Music (91)
- Natural Hazards (248)
- navel gazing (15)
- Off topic (e.g., personal) (62)
- Outdoor Recreation (149)
- Peak Oil (6)
- Policy Benefits (143)
- Policy Costs (142)
- Politics (50)
- Public Humiliation (16)
- Puerile Humor (125)
- Recipes (2)
- Recommended Reading (315)
- Religion (17)
- Research (1208)
- Science (60)
- Self-loathing (49)
- Solid Waste (31)
- Sports (374)
- Sustainability (23)
- Teaching (597)
- Television (16)
- The Energy Collective (22)
- Tourism (13)
- Trade (14)
- Transportation (52)
- Travel (142)
- Value of statistical life (7)
- Water Quality (126)
- Water Quantity (124)
- Weather (109)
- Web/Tech (3)
- Weblogs (135)
- Wildlife Resources (195)