A reminder that the broken window game has never been short on players

This was originally posted on 3-8-08 under the title "'Create jobs' sells, 'Increase efficiency' doesn't" (I was, like, 24 years old back then):

At Terra Rosa:

In a new nationwide TV ad premiering [March 17], three surprising voices join the climate chorus:

* Robert Lane, CEO of John Deere,

* Alexander M. “Sandy” Cutler, CEO of Eaton Corp., and
* Frank Knapp, president of the 5,000-member South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce

These leaders urge Congress to adopt a market-based cap & trade policy. They’ve put their business credibility to work for this message: cap & trade will drive the investments necessary to create American jobs and stop climate change.

Actually, there will be no major long-term impact on the number of jobs in the U.S. My prediction is that the unemployment rate, the labor force participation rate and the employment population ratio will not be significantly affected by significant climate policy. Why? The (CO2 intensive) job losses that climate policy opponents trumpet will be offset by the (CO2 not-so-intensive) job gains that climate policy proponents trumpet (remember the "giant sucking sound" that was to be NAFTA?).

Now it is a brand new post! From the inbox on 7-30-13:

We have recently decided to move our site terrarossa.com permanently to our new site address environmental.laws.com . I kindly request you to update the terrarossa.com link in your website to point to the page on our new home environmental.laws.com.

Our terrarossa.com link is referenced in this page:
http://www.env-econ.net/2008/03/index.html

Please change it to:
http://environmental.laws.com/

Unfortunately, I can't find where they put that old webpage (here are the results of the google search for the text) so there is not much point in editing the Terra Rosa link, is there (I've sent a request to the webmaster)? 

Besides, my comments about the link were negative so why would they want me to fix their dead link to a dead post?

It is notable that the environmental broken window fallacy is not new and will likely go on forever.