David Autor, JEP editor, in "The Journal of Economic Perspectives at 100 (Issues)":
JEP has often staged battles between traditional and revisionist economic viewpoints, and it’s far from clear that the revisionists have always prevailed. For example, three of JEP’s 40 most highly cited articles stem from a single 1994 symposium on the value of contingent valuation as a tool for pricing environmental amenities. The most cited of these articles (“Contingent Valuation—Is Some Number Better than No Number?” by Diamond and Hausman) savaged the contingent valuation methodology.
Diamond and Hausman is the #3 cited JEP paper of all time with 534, Hanemann is at #14 with 332 and Portney is #34 with 239.
My guess is that some of those 534 citations aren't applauding the savage efforts of the authors.