"Of the major players in the Kyoto protocol, my sense is that the EU is the only one still considering signing up in some fashion to a second commitment period,"
via www.mnn.com
« About what am I optimistic and pessimistic? — Marginal Revolution | Main | Are Peak Oilers really economists in sheep's clothing? »
September 20, 2011
Comments
Info
Subscribe
Buy our books :)
Categories
- Agriculture (74)
- Air Quality (198)
- Answer Desk (28)
- Attempt at humor (237)
- Beer (49)
- Behavioral Economics (1)
- Benefit-cost analysis (306)
- Book Reviews (52)
- Books (43)
- Cap-and-Trade (32)
- Cap-and-Trade Watch (316)
- Carbon Tax (135)
- Climate Change (1477)
- Coastal management (133)
- Contingent valuation (43)
- Contributors (130)
- Current Affairs (48)
- Deepwater Horizon blowout (42)
- Demand and Supply (156)
- Dubious to hopeless (22)
- Ecological Economics (60)
- Econometrics (13)
- Ecosystem Services (9)
- Energy Resources (1152)
- Environmental Justice (2)
- Film (2)
- Fishery Resources (402)
- Food and Drink (252)
- Forestry Resources (98)
- Games (3)
- Gas Tax (31)
- Government Policy (873)
- Guest Post (55)
- Health Effects (101)
- Humor (337)
- Just Because (95)
- Kahn (14)
- Land Resources (123)
- Macroeconomics (353)
- Marine Resources (104)
- Microeconomics (306)
- Movies (20)
- Murder (1)
- Music (93)
- Natural Hazards (250)
- navel gazing (15)
- Off topic (e.g., personal) (63)
- Outdoor Recreation (151)
- Peak Oil (6)
- Policy Benefits (143)
- Policy Costs (142)
- Politics (53)
- Public Humiliation (17)
- Puerile Humor (125)
- Recipes (2)
- Recommended Reading (316)
- Religion (17)
- Research (1218)
- Science (60)
- Self-loathing (49)
- Solid Waste (31)
- Sports (375)
- Sustainability (25)
- Teaching (603)
- Television (16)
- The Energy Collective (22)
- Tourism (13)
- Trade (14)
- Transportation (55)
- Travel (145)
- Value of statistical life (7)
- Water Quality (129)
- Water Quantity (125)
- Weather (109)
- Web/Tech (3)
- Weblogs (137)
- Wildlife Resources (196)