Four days ago I suggested that water bans don't have much effect on water use (Watering Restrictions Begin Today in Mecklenburg):
Mecklenburg County today will enforce its first mandatory water
restrictions in five years as searing heat, little rainfall and high
demand steadily empty reservoirs.
The
Mecklenburg restrictions will apply in Charlotte and throughout the
county. They limit lawn watering to twice a week, based on addresses,
and ban residential car washing and refilling of pools and ornamental
ponds. Fines start at $100.
...
Mandatory reductions in Mecklenburg in 2002 cut water demand by 22 percent and netted 1,985 fines.
The
goal now is to lower demand by 10 percent. Restrictions are expected
for at least 30 days. They could get tougher -- once-a-week or no lawn
watering -- if conditions deteriorate.
Correction: when command and control policies are combined with economic incentives, e.g., fines, and effective monitoring and enforcement, the outcome can mimic a policy based solely on economic incentives. However, economic incentive policies are still more cost-effective. In this case if the price of water rose with increased household usage, and there were further price increases during a drought, cities would probably avoid resorting to temporary water bans based on whether your street number is even or odd.