Bookmark and Share

Climate Policy in 2009!

Opinion Poll

  • Do you ... "an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions" in 2009?
    strongly support
    somewhat support (I'd strongly support a carbon tax)
    somewhat support (I'm worried about the recession)
    somewhat support (some other reason)
    somewhat do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    somewhat do not support (wait until after the recession)
    somewhat do not support (some other reason)
    strongly do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    strongly do not support (wait until after the recession)
    strongly do not support (some other reason)
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

November 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« Dark Side: Part Duece | Main | Signs of economic efficiency »

July 10, 2009

Comments

If the MTBF is accurate, some lucky guy has a 20,000 hour lightbulb.

doh, 15

"I don't think I realized my promised energy savings."

Worse, you likely also forced your utility to have to generate more power than you thought it took to light that lamp of yours!

But, back to the problem at hand, there is that whole problem of large numbers of shoddy CFLs being produced, mainly for the sake of getting the cost of the lamps down to a level where consumers will choose to buy them.

"I don't think I realized my promised energy savings."

Yes, but just think about all the Green jobs you will be creating when you are out buying a new bulb.

If something sounds too good to be true, it usually is.

Thank you for posting this question - it's a prime example of the short term thinking, stop-gap solutions our wonderful government (all levels) dishes out.

- points above are certainly valid.
- CFL's have a "life span" issue if you cycle them too often (on/off)
- what will you do with the mercury from your old bulb.

Since you are aware (most likely) these are hazzardous waste...you'll probably take them to a proper disposal facility.

How many Americans are just tossing them in the garbage? We'll soon have issues with Mercury leeching into our water supply.

I still think these bulbs are a good idea if you properly match the bulb to the application....but, they're no silver bullet.

How do you know how many hours it ran? did you have a timer on it? Was the circuit overloaded and below voltage? Was it in a location it is switched on and off frequently? Was it on a dimmer switch?

Any of these will reduce lifetime.

Hydra

The comments to this entry are closed.

... because Blogads are good for you.

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats





  • View My Stats

Don't believe what they're saying

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem