Bookmark and Share

Climate Policy in 2009!

Opinion Poll

  • Do you ... "an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions" in 2009?
    strongly support
    somewhat support (I'd strongly support a carbon tax)
    somewhat support (I'm worried about the recession)
    somewhat support (some other reason)
    somewhat do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    somewhat do not support (wait until after the recession)
    somewhat do not support (some other reason)
    strongly do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    strongly do not support (wait until after the recession)
    strongly do not support (some other reason)
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« Save the Bay. Again? | Main | D'oh! »

December 10, 2008

Maximize the benefits, but what about the costs?

Popular Mechanics lists their top 10 pieces of infrastructure that "we must fix now:

  1. Circle Interchange, Chicago
  2. Brooklyn Bridge, New York
  3. Canal Lock, New Orleans
  4. Water System, Atlanta
  5. Alaskan Way Viaduct, Seattle
  6. Lake Okeechobee, Florida
  7. Dover Bridge, Bonner County, Idaho
  8. Wolf Creek Dam, Kentucky
  9. Sacramento River Levees, California
  10. O'Hare International Airport, Chicago

The benefits seem high but I'm not sure about the costs. I think it would be cool if some economics blog would list the top 10 pieces of infrastructure ranked in terms of net benefits.

Comments

One of the Common Tragedies crew linked to a blog that linked to a web site that linked to a ... well, at the end of the trail of blog crumbs is a CBO analysis from earlier this year that discussed this question, not in terms of individual projects but in terms of overall scope:

http://commontragedies.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/smart-stimulus/

We don't pay attention to the common tragedies crew anymore. They suggested we meet up while in DC then left us standing in the cold outside a closed bar.

Hey -- we'll have PLENTY of money from the carbon tax, so who cares about NET anything?!? :)

http://aguanomics.com/2008/12/poll-results-carbon-revenue.html

One of the benefits of properly fixing the Canal Locks in New Orleans would be more goodwill towards closing the MRGO.

The MRGO has been a big "if", as in, we (transport) need the MRGO "if" the Canal Locks fail. Since Katrina it has further morphed from "if" to "when"...

As an ex-Sacramentan, I can say the reason that Sacramento is so high on the list is that someone let tens of thousands of homes be built behind subsidized levees. And recently in N Natomas, much developer pressure successfully allowed even more homes to be built in a basin. Not a typo.

Best,

D

It's interesting that the national electrical grid didn't make the list. As far as I know, nothing has fundamentally changed in that system since 2003, when a minor problem snowballed into a regional disaster that blacked out the entire Northeast for two days.

I'm surprised that the smart grid idea is playing up as well as it is in the blogosphere ... but I'm still skeptical that it will make the jump to the real world.

The comments to this entry are closed.


Blogads are good for you.

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats





  • View My Stats

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem