Bookmark and Share

Climate Policy in 2009!

Opinion Poll

  • Do you ... "an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions" in 2009?
    strongly support
    somewhat support (I'd strongly support a carbon tax)
    somewhat support (I'm worried about the recession)
    somewhat support (some other reason)
    somewhat do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    somewhat do not support (wait until after the recession)
    somewhat do not support (some other reason)
    strongly do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    strongly do not support (wait until after the recession)
    strongly do not support (some other reason)
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« Reverse causality | Main | Demand and supply in the airline industry »

November 25, 2008

Food Fight!

Food_fight_2 From the Columbus Dispatch:

Fending off criticism that they fear could jeopardize ethanol subsidies, Ohio corn growers shot back at corporate food producers yesterday, saying they continue to charge high prices and reap big profits even as corn prices plunge.

Corn growers are facing off against a broad coalition including livestock groups, restaurants and corporate food companies that is calling on President-elect Barack Obama to end the nearly $5 billion in annual subsidies for the ethanol industry.

Since I've already angered the auto industry, why stop there?  I'm opposed to many (most?) farm subsidies.  I'm all for correcting externalities by subsidising beneficial behaviors and taxing costly behaviors.

But artificially inflating incomes of inefficient businesses? That's bad policy.

Comments

After realing from the effects of foreign oil dependency - should we allow ourselves to become dependent on foriegn food sources as well?

Ethanol is a terrible idea. Regardless of one's personal opinion, it takes more energy to produce it than it makes. Not too mention the unintended consequences like "high food prices".

In pure market driven economic terms, subsidies are bad for obvious reasons; however, SOME consideration must be made for strategic objectives.

The question is how much and which items?

Record Profits for Oil Companies...and continued subsidies. Record profits for Insurance companies, then a Bail Out when their gamble didn't pan out. High Profits for most Big Corporations and the safety net of Bail Outs in the offing if they miss-manage. Why should the little guy; the farmer, factory worker (the few we have left),food service employee, etc have to suffer always being shorted on profits?

Who helped the farmer a few years ago when foreclosures broke up family farms, to be bought up by Big Agra? I'm surprised that the farmers do not go out on strike. Ethanol from corn is a very bad idea...hemp is a far better producer than corn but no one is allowed to grow it.

I do not mind if real individual farmers make a little profit now, not the "Absentee Farmer" who reaps much of the subsidies according to the latest GAO Report.

The day will come when the 'workers' "throw their bodies upon the gears and levers of the machine and make it grind to a halt until fairness is restored." Then we will see if the Government is 'of, for, and by the People' or 'of, for and by Corporate America'.

The comments to this entry are closed.


Blogads are good for you.

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats





  • View My Stats

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem