Bookmark and Share

Climate Policy in 2009!

Opinion Poll

  • Do you ... "an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions" in 2009?
    strongly support
    somewhat support (I'd strongly support a carbon tax)
    somewhat support (I'm worried about the recession)
    somewhat support (some other reason)
    somewhat do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    somewhat do not support (wait until after the recession)
    somewhat do not support (some other reason)
    strongly do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    strongly do not support (wait until after the recession)
    strongly do not support (some other reason)
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« Picture of the Day | Main | High prices lead to better strippers* »

September 17, 2008

Conclusion: Turn off power to everyone in Ohio

Day 4 in Central Ohio with no power to hundreds of thousands of residents.  But there's an upside.  From the Columbus Dispatch:

As thousands of Ohioans go through another day without power, perhaps there's a silver, or even green, lining.

Their carbon footprints -- the measure of carbon dioxide they contribute to global warming -- is much, much smaller.

The typical Ohio house uses an average of 31 kilowatt hours of electricity a day, according to estimates from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Every day without power cuts an estimated 65 pounds of carbon dioxide produced by a coal-fired power plant.

Spread that across the nearly 2 million homes and businesses across Ohio that lost electricity Sunday, and the reduction in carbon-dioxide emissions was at least 124.3 million pounds.

I'm speechless.

Comments

The next step is for them to realize that repairing the damage will both result in greenhouse gas emissions directly and enable thousands of Ohioans to resume their regular high-carbon-emitting lifestyles.

Stop the madness!

Are you upset because AGW seems to be accepted in Ohio, or because they spill ink on a tenuous silver lining?

They should write an upside about North Korea's carbon footprint.

http://blogan.net/blog/wp-content/2006/10/korea2.jpg

This is true.

I love Ohio. My family is still without power up there, but we do have a larger footprint than any region in the country. At least things haven't broken down into riots...I just got word that some of my friends back in Dayton just got power back.

If something has benefits there so that has losses as well. Here is the same situation; I simply can say that “there is no gain without pain”. And if the people can live without electricity then it’s Okay. And it’s all up to the residents of Ohio what they want?


Outsourcing Solution in BPO


Peter Thomson

You know, there's some appeal to this logic. By extension, global food shortages could help us deal with this pesky obesity epidemic.

Hey, think of the carbon reduction if we simply shut off power to every city larger than say, 10,000 people!

Yours first...

Hi
he typical Ohio house uses an average of 31 kilowatt hours of electricity a day, according to estimates from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Every day without power cuts an estimated 65 pounds of carbon dioxide produced by a coal-fired power plant.

Max


Addiction Recovery Michigan

The comments to this entry are closed.


Blogads are good for you.

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats





  • View My Stats

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem