Bookmark and Share

Climate Policy in 2009!

Opinion Poll

  • Do you ... "an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions" in 2009?
    strongly support
    somewhat support (I'd strongly support a carbon tax)
    somewhat support (I'm worried about the recession)
    somewhat support (some other reason)
    somewhat do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    somewhat do not support (wait until after the recession)
    somewhat do not support (some other reason)
    strongly do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    strongly do not support (wait until after the recession)
    strongly do not support (some other reason)
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

February 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28            
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« Student question on farm subsidies | Main | ManBearPig »

May 07, 2008

Comments

This makes me sad.

As someone who is starting an aggie PhD this fall, I almost choked on my coffee this morning when I saw this. If John is right about the paper's methodology, it seems eqivalent to setting the football BCS poll according to the strength of your basketball team.

SC,

I think a better analogy is setting the BCS football poll without the SEC schools.

The remainder of the JEL field rankings should be fine.

Point taken. I was just referring to the ag and resource rankings.

But I think what you meant to say was "...without the Big 10 schools."

Weird. I just counted them and there are 11 schools in the Big 10! Weird.

re: Big Ten:

When my alma mater Penn State joined the Big Ten years ago, I think the Big Ten figured it had too much brand equity to change its name, but if you look carefully at the logo, you will find a cleverly-embedded "11".

This is ridiculous and why I hate rankings. Sorry, if UC-Berkeley isn't near the top this is junk. And yeah, I graduated from there.

This is ridiculous and why I hate rankings. Sorry, if UC-Berkeley isn't near the top this is junk. And yeah, I graduated from there.

With all due respect aren't you being extremely parochial. I thought we had some of the best agricultural economics faculties of the world, in Australia. In my own State, University of Sydney or University of New England would have to rank as some of the best in the world. Not having been at university for a while I will not swear on them but it was only a few years ago that I was still dealing with them and they were still exceptionally good. I think Australian agricultural economics is a step ahead of American universities primarily because it is straight applied Micro economics using small country assumption for world markets. I think you will be adopting this approach in the future.

several of those schools in the list don't even have ag. econ departments, so how can they top the list for ag econ? (I'm looking at you GA State.)

The comments to this entry are closed.


... because Blogads are good for you.

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats





  • View My Stats

Don't believe what they're saying

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem