Bookmark and Share

Climate Policy in 2009!

Opinion Poll

  • Do you ... "an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions" in 2009?
    strongly support
    somewhat support (I'd strongly support a carbon tax)
    somewhat support (I'm worried about the recession)
    somewhat support (some other reason)
    somewhat do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    somewhat do not support (wait until after the recession)
    somewhat do not support (some other reason)
    strongly do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    strongly do not support (wait until after the recession)
    strongly do not support (some other reason)
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« Graduating seniors. what are you gonna do? | Main | Yeah, but will it play all of these damned Betamax tapes I have in the basement? »

May 09, 2008

Several benefit-cost analysis opportunities from the CBO

What is the value of a wolf? What is the value of a crane? What is the value of a praire chicken? What is the value of a marine mammal?

Note: make sure you use a stated preference method (no enough folks have revealed preferences for wolves, cranes, chickens and whales) and do a literature search (related work has already been done).

Comments

I think cranes are very important. They help build buildings, bridges, roads, etc. We should protect them.

Sorry, I had to add some bad humor to the comments section after the firestorm my email set off between you(John) and Odo

Looking,

Good point. you can get a good construction crane for $60,000. you don't need a stated preference study if there are market prices!

I most love me some economists if I spend three hours this morning reading their news.

Here's one you guys will like:

Ethanol Fantasy Fuels a Food-Price Nightmare

I was wrong in my predictions here that the ethanol backlash would be swift. It is building much slower than I expected.

Got another one for you, from USA Today:

"Record high gas prices are prompting Americans to drive less for the first time in nearly three decades, squeezing family budgets and causing major shifts in driving habits, federal data and a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll show."

Back on topic and a couple of days too late.

I'm a statistician and not an economist, but I think there should not be a single number describing the value of a wolf. Rather it should depend inversely and nonlinearly on the size of the wolf population. If there are only two wolves, one male and one female, left in the world, then their value should be incredibly high. Whereas if there are several million wolves around, then the value of an individual wolf should be much less.

I'm not at all familiar with the literature in this area, so I'm sure that somebody has done research on this.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blogads

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats





  • View My Stats

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem