Bookmark and Share

Climate Policy in 2009!

Opinion Poll

  • Do you ... "an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions" in 2009?
    strongly support
    somewhat support (I'd strongly support a carbon tax)
    somewhat support (I'm worried about the recession)
    somewhat support (some other reason)
    somewhat do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    somewhat do not support (wait until after the recession)
    somewhat do not support (some other reason)
    strongly do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    strongly do not support (wait until after the recession)
    strongly do not support (some other reason)
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« Who pays a gas tax? | Main | Another journal rankings paper -- how do the Env. Econ. journals do? »

April 02, 2008

Comments

This is really a bad idea, but it's common to hear populist politicians promising the world to people.

Why not make a law limiting price increases on cable TV, cars or tennis shoes? These are all "essential" goods, right?

The problem is that many people stopped thinking about the price of gas long ago. Higher prices are suddenly making them look at their behavior and some of them are VERY scared that their poor decisions (SUV, suburbs, commute, one car/person) are going to get VERY expensive.

This is the same "oh uh" problem that people are facing wrt their mortgages now. Suddenly they realize that they cannot afford to have five bedrooms and vaulted ceilings with two people and a goldfish.

Seems like many people made the same bad choices. They should have listened to their "depression baby" elders -- not the politicians and mortgage bankers who offered a free lunch.

We need people to sit down and think hard about what they are doing and the consequences that result. How about gas at $6/gallon and interest at 10%?

In order to reduce the amount of money people pay for fuel, I propose an arbitrary increase in the fuel tax. The massive price increase will mean people stop buying so much fuel in the short term because it puts it out of their price range. As America starts walking, cycling and catching the bus again people will realise they don't need cars.

They'll also boot out any government who raises taxes that much.

The comments to this entry are closed.


Blogads are good for you.

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats





  • View My Stats

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem