Bookmark and Share

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

March 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« Big welfare gains for me | Main | Another IM basketball tourney update »

March 28, 2008

Comments

Should you change your slogan to: Drive Less, Drive Fast?

I take the amount of time-filling, bad, television broadcast in this country as simple proof that people could slow down.

other factors to include (for some grad student somewhere):

- decreased (or increased?) likelihood of getting into an accident
- probability and cost of getting a speeding ticket

and the most important of all....

- reduced stress level by cruising along in the slow lane: priceless.

The study (via CU, no less) provides important information to consumers. Many know little more than "city" and "highway" mileage.

People DO use those little gauges that describe real time consumption, so this information is useful.

Much better to *know* you are trading $10 for faster speeds than to assume it's a free lunch (or costing you $25).

My Corolla gets near-top EPA mileage at 70-75 mph. And my Honda Reflex gets 65mpg at freeway speeds.

So, no, I don't see any real need to slow down. The only thing I've noticed lately is that since the EPA mandated more ethanol in gas, my mileage has gone down a little.

You're absolutely right about the relationship between gas prices and wages: it costs more to use less.

It's interesting to note that in much of the world, the ratio between gas and labor prices is much different. For example, in Sri Lanka (where I've spent a great deal of time), gas costs about $4 per gallon, and the typical wage is $2 per day. That means a gallon of gas costs about 2 days pay.

Can you imagine that ratio here in the U.S.? Gas would run somewhere around $150 per gallon! THAT would change our driving habits.

@odo: the trouble with the television theory of highway speed is that the people watching large amounts of bad TV are clearly not the ones whose time is of any value whatsoever.

Cervus: you may not be getting the most from your Corolla.

at 65mph, my Ford Focus just edges higher than the EPA mileage. At 60 mph, I can beat the EPA by 4mpg. (39.5 best recorded, in Michigan's upper peninsula)

For safety, I don't recommend going 10 under the speed limit, but I've found five under to be no problem.

The comments to this entry are closed.


... because Blogads are good for you.

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats





  • View My Stats

Don't believe what they're saying

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem