Reader Feedback

  • Suppose you go to the beach. What would you rather see on the horizon, a bunch of oil rigs or a bunch of windmills?
    A bunch of oil rigs
    A bunch of wind mills
    A bunch of both
    Neither
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

December 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« Corn ethanol and unintended consequences | Main | Say it ain't so, Lance »

February 08, 2008

"REEP Advance Access articles have been made available (for the period 5 Feb 2008 to 7 Feb 2008)"

I received this in an email this morning. The availability date has passed but Hanemann's "California's new greenhouse gas laws" still appears to be available.

California's new greenhouse gas laws
     Michael Hanemann
     Rev Environ Econ Policy published 7 February 2008, 10.1093/reep/rem030
     http://reep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/rem030v1?papetoc

Since 2004, California has taken a variety of measures to control greenhouse gas emissions. This culminated in August 2006 with the passage of AB 32, which requires that overall GHG emissions in California be reduced to their 1990 levels by 2020; SB 1368, which prohibits California utilities from signing new long-term baseload power contracts with emissions higher than those from combined-cycle natural gas; and SB 107, which requires 20 percent of California's electricity to come from renewables by 2010. This article describes how California's GHG laws came to be enacted, why they took the form that they did, and how they differ from the approaches to pollution control adopted by the federal government in the 1990 Clean Air Act and the northeastern states in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. California's approach grows directly out of its prior, and rather unique, history in controlling automobile emissions and in regulating energy efficiency. Moreover, its approach reflects an awareness of some differences between GHG emissions and SO2 and NOx emissions, which are important for the design of a GHG control policy.

Comments

Sounds like an interesting article. Unfortunately it has expired by now, but I'll try to access it at work next week.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blogads

Subscribe

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats




  • View My Stats

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem