Bookmark and Share

Climate Policy in 2009!

Opinion Poll

  • Do you ... "an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions" in 2009?
    strongly support
    somewhat support (I'd strongly support a carbon tax)
    somewhat support (I'm worried about the recession)
    somewhat support (some other reason)
    somewhat do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    somewhat do not support (wait until after the recession)
    somewhat do not support (some other reason)
    strongly do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    strongly do not support (wait until after the recession)
    strongly do not support (some other reason)
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« Announcing higher housing prices in Raleigh, NC | Main | Clinton (Mr.) on how to slow down climate change »

January 31, 2008

Another reason to hate Duke

From the AP:

Duke Energy Corporation has received the final OK from state environmental regulators to build a coal-fired power generator in Western North Carolina.

Duke received its final air permit today, and company officials said they plan to begin construction immediately.

The generator is an upgrade to Duke Energy's Cliffside plant about 50 miles west of Charlotte. Construction is expected to take four years, and officials said it will create 1,600 new jobs with a total payroll of about $100 million.

The cost of the plant stands at $2.4 billion.

The project has been strongly opposed by environmental groups that said the generator will lead to more carbon dioxide emissions. They also accuse Duke Energy of not fully considering the use of renewable fuels, such as solar or wind power.

Comments

shouldn't you be more upset with the NC gov authorities for granting the permit? were it not for the permit, duke couldn't/wouldn't build the plant.

just thinking that maybe the state is more responsible than the corp, since the state is suppose to be the regulator & oversight body, making them ultimately responsible for degradation within their state.

I applaud Duke's decision to develop this Coal plant. The energy is needed and the environmental impact minimal. Your emotional response is childish. You need to employ reason not your feelings.

Don't worry John, I got your witty tag line "Another Reason to Hate Duke" without the inside jokes link. Bee should also learn that you enjoy being called childish, in fact, it makes you giggle.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blogads

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats





  • View My Stats

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem