Reader Feedback

  • Suppose you go to the beach. What would you rather see on the horizon, a bunch of oil rigs or a bunch of windmills?
    A bunch of oil rigs
    A bunch of wind mills
    A bunch of both
    Neither
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

December 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« Doing my part | Main | The only function of [fill in your favorite topic] forecasting is to make astrology look respectable* »

December 07, 2007

I'm a subject matter expert: Part 5

Here is part 5 of my 7 part series:

But won't our economy come crashing down without coal and oil? Is a change of this magnitude possible without an economic crisis?

The transition from coal and oil to renewable energy sources, if nudged along with incremental economic policies, is likely to be fairly smooth in terms of macroeconomics. In other words, energy switching will not cause another Great Depression. The major changes resulting from energy switching will be within regions of the U.S. and sectors of the economy, which undergo major transitions periodically. For example, when I was in graduate school at UK during the late-1980s the IBM typewriter plant was a major employer. As computer technology took over the typewriter plant shut down and lots of people lost jobs. This is an economic crisis for the families of those who lost jobs but not the sort of crisis that we want to avoid. The transition from typewriters to computers significantly cut production costs for business firms and increased overall employment. The transition from oil and coal to renewable energy sources is not likely to increase the number of jobs in the U.S., despite wild claims by those who are currently pushing government policies to mandate renewable energy sources, but there would be positive economic effects such as the improved health and recreation from improved air and water quality and mitigation of climate change.

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blogads

Subscribe

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats




  • View My Stats

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem