Reader Feedback

  • Suppose you go to the beach. What would you rather see on the horizon, a bunch of oil rigs or a bunch of windmills?
    A bunch of oil rigs
    A bunch of wind mills
    A bunch of both
    Neither
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

December 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« I'm the economics club speaker | Main | Maybe the dogs know something we don't »

November 27, 2007

This is a green website

For what it is worth, see the bottom of the left hand column:

CO2Stats is a free tool that monitors and offsets your blog or web site's carbon dioxide emissions by calculating how much power your visitors are consuming to view it. For each pound of CO2 resulting from your site traffic, The CO2Stats Project purchases carbon offsets that benefit the environment. ...

Here is the website: http://www.co2stats.com.

Hat tip: Aaron Schiff

Comments

I have no idea what this site is about. The web server runs continuously whether anyone visits it or not. It is estimated that all such servers in the US now consume several percent of the national electricity.

The same is true for the viewer's side. Many people leave their computers on continuously whether they are using them or not. Even when they are "off" many continue to require power to maintain the state of the machine and run the internal clock and the like.

Improving the efficiency of servers is one of the areas where the big firms are now engaged in the most active competition. Not only do the server farms use all this power, they require expensive cooling systems to keep them from overheating. A small change in power usage can have a large impact in the cost of establishing a new data center.

Let's not forget that the communications infrastructure (the "tubes") also runs continuously.

Strange that no one ever discusses the energy use of the broadcast industry. How many 50,000 watt radio stations do we have in this country? (This is "effective" radiated power, but it's still significant and TV usage is higher.)

I just don't buy the idea of offsets. If you want to make a difference then just use less. Don't buy peace of mind by greenwashing. You can plant trees, but you can't put the oil back into the ground.

I think offsets are ok, when you have some argument for additionally. Come to think of it, I still might be running on one of the tax-deductible personal offsets.

That said, I look forward to getting an eee pc (asus) and knocking my low ($15/mo) power bill a little lower.

But ... Nothing is "free." Have you looked into where and how they are offsetting you?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blogads

Subscribe

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats




  • View My Stats

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem