Bookmark and Share

Climate Policy in 2009!

Opinion Poll

  • Do you ... "an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions" in 2009?
    strongly support
    somewhat support (I'd strongly support a carbon tax)
    somewhat support (I'm worried about the recession)
    somewhat support (some other reason)
    somewhat do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    somewhat do not support (wait until after the recession)
    somewhat do not support (some other reason)
    strongly do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    strongly do not support (wait until after the recession)
    strongly do not support (some other reason)
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« New climate legislation | Main | More North Carolina drought news »

October 19, 2007

Comments

Maybe they should add more corn syrup, and use less barley ... no wait, corn syrup is going up, and the beer would taste like Coors ... never mind.

stop stupid wasteful corn subsidies and work toward a real fuel for the future that isn't a waste of time and money like ethanol...

stop stupid wasteful corn subsidies and work toward a real fuel for the future that isn't a waste of time and money like ethanol...

the solution for me is very simple. microbrews produce a bottle of beer for less than they sell it for, the ethanol industry produces a gallon of fuel for more than the market will bear. its a loser, lets stop acting like ethanol is anything more than political subsidy, pandering to the US farming regions that are woefully unprepared and/or unwilling to change for new economic realities.

There has never been a more compelling reason to end ethanol subsidies. To distort the market so that one, clearly less sublime, form of ethanol is being produced in the stead of Craft Beer, one of the pinnacles of human achievement, is completely unacceptable! And like the other posts have already pointed out, ethanol is not a viable fuel; even if we converted all of the US' corn production to ethanol, it would cover only a fraction of our transportation fuel needs. And that's if we forwent all other uses of corn!

Ethanol is one step toward separating us from oil dependancy. It's not the perfect solution, and it's not the only solution. It is part of the learning process. We need government subsidies to help lower the barriers to entry. We don't need to continue the subsidies very long.

The comments to this entry are closed.


Blogads are good for you.

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats





  • View My Stats

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem