Bookmark and Share

Climate Policy in 2009!

Opinion Poll

  • Do you ... "an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions" in 2009?
    strongly support
    somewhat support (I'd strongly support a carbon tax)
    somewhat support (I'm worried about the recession)
    somewhat support (some other reason)
    somewhat do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    somewhat do not support (wait until after the recession)
    somewhat do not support (some other reason)
    strongly do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    strongly do not support (wait until after the recession)
    strongly do not support (some other reason)
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« Now the whole world thinks that I'm an idiot | Main | It's been a while since we argued over Coase »

May 31, 2007

Quote of the day

In the context of President Bush's call to do something about climate change in 2050 (hey, why not make 3050 the deadline?):

"We do not endorse global carbon trading," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino told reporters before Bush's speech.

So much for the political feasibility of cap-and-trade ... unless the key word is global.

And here is another quote of the, er, day:

"We're the world's leader when it comes to figuring out new ways to power our economy and be good stewards of the environment," Bush said.

Comments

No, this is the quote of the day:

"To assume that it is a problem is to assume that the state of Earth's climate today is the optimal climate, the best climate that we could have or ever have had and that we need to take steps to make sure that it doesn't change," Griffin said. "I guess I would ask which human beings — where and when — are to be accorded the privilege of deciding that this particular climate that we have right here today, right now is the best climate for all other human beings. I think that's a rather arrogant position for people to take."

Of course this is a BushCo appointee, so naturally the FUD talk.

And we note that ideologues cling to statements by engineers restating the false canard "warming is good for you! rather than listening to social scientists, anthropologists, or climatologists.

Best,

D

I'd venture to say that the key word in the opposition to global carbon trading is "global."

It's clear that a domestic carbon trading scheme still has a lot more support in Washington than a carbon tax.

Reading what Josh put relating to the quote he read:

""To assume that it is a problem is to assume that the state of Earth's climate today is the optimal climate, the best climate that we could have or ever have had and that we need to take steps to make sure that it doesn't change," Griffin said. "I guess I would ask which human beings — where and when — are to be accorded the privilege of deciding that this particular climate that we have right here today, right now is the best climate for all other human beings. I think that's a rather arrogant position for people to take.""

Made me think OMG

Now we're going to spend time debating on what sort of climate we'd like or prefer etc.....

This lack of a straight line at times does more harm than good.....

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blogads

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats





  • View My Stats

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem