Bookmark and Share

Climate Policy in 2009!

Opinion Poll

  • Do you ... "an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions" in 2009?
    strongly support
    somewhat support (I'd strongly support a carbon tax)
    somewhat support (I'm worried about the recession)
    somewhat support (some other reason)
    somewhat do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    somewhat do not support (wait until after the recession)
    somewhat do not support (some other reason)
    strongly do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    strongly do not support (wait until after the recession)
    strongly do not support (some other reason)
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

February 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28            
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« There's an economic moral in here somewhere... | Main | NRS on coastal erosion »

October 15, 2006

Comments

Maybe to other economists, y'all seem like filthy hippies.

you had that poll up for so long that i began to just vote repeatedly and randomly depending on my mood...

sorry if i messed up your scientific study.

:)

I was pretty surprised by that result but maybe it says more about your readers than about your blog!

Joshua,

The polls are set up to not allow more than 1 vote from each voter (based on IP address or something) every year. Hopefully this kicks out multiple votes.

Note: I've kept it up so long because I can't think of another one right now.

John

I reckon people think this blog is so green because a lot of results tend to favour the greens. This is because environmental economics is a relatively new science, constantly combatting the old allocations of resources which were based on a different paradigm of decision making. It is my hope that when EE matures and has a strong hold on current allocative decisions that it will come to represent a true middle ground in the green/brown debate, hopefully, eradicating this pointless waste of intellectual resources all together.

I hope for an balance in environmental thought based on the more arbitrary elements of EE. Being green isn't the answer, nor is being brown....so i'm sure you can guess what the answer is.

The unscientific results of our recent poll show that opinions of mine and John environmental views are varied. Some think we are greener than Kermit the Frog while others think we're as brown as, um, something really brown. I've run across similar comments in a class I teach: Resource Economics. The class membership consists of a combination of econ majors (capitalists) and natural resource majors (environmentalists). My experience has been that the economists tend to label me an environmentalist while the environmentalists tend to label me a capitalist. I think I'm doing my job.

If it's based on IP adress then it doesn't do much to keep someone from voting more than once. Most people have dynamic IP adresses so just disconnecting the internet would allow you to vote again. That comes down to a vote a day depending on how often you visit the site.

The comments to this entry are closed.


... because Blogads are good for you.

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats





  • View My Stats

Don't believe what they're saying

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem