Reader Feedback

  • Suppose you go to the beach. What would you rather see on the horizon, a bunch of oil rigs or a bunch of windmills?
    A bunch of oil rigs
    A bunch of wind mills
    A bunch of both
    Neither
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

December 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« Tim on the NPR Mixed Signals blog | Main | Offshore drilling in NC update »

April 26, 2006

And if we put the lead back in it would be even cheaper...

While we're on the subject of gas prices...

Additionally, Bush said he would ask the EPA to temporarily ease clean air regulations that have caused gas shortages in some portions of the Northeast.

Besides having a minimal effect, do we really want to lower gas prices at the expense of the environment? 

Comments

From the whitehouse

"[...] is it correct that the President has the authority only for 20 days to waive those restrictions?"

"That is correct."

As a practical issue, why worry about 20 days? Of course, if anyone wants a long-term change to lead or MTBE, we'll have to trot out the cost/benefit analysis.

You might enjoy this, from the Christain Science Monitor:

Creeping toward oil as a social good

oil prices fell on bush's anouncement...

Drive less?...or open the reserves and eliminate the EPA.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blogads

Subscribe

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats




  • View My Stats

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem