Bookmark and Share

Climate Policy in 2009!

Opinion Poll

  • Do you ... "an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions" in 2009?
    strongly support
    somewhat support (I'd strongly support a carbon tax)
    somewhat support (I'm worried about the recession)
    somewhat support (some other reason)
    somewhat do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    somewhat do not support (wait until after the recession)
    somewhat do not support (some other reason)
    strongly do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    strongly do not support (wait until after the recession)
    strongly do not support (some other reason)
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« We wuz scooped by DoL | Main | Big World, Small Pond »

August 23, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bd4869e200d8346350b769e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New CAFE standards:

» Late-Season Snowfall Strikes East Coast from were treated
treated to a last gasp of winter Wednesday as big snowflakes fell on the metro area. [Read More]

» Indian outsourcers to grade job applicants from than 10 percent
will go down, Shahabuddin said. SEE ALSO: Wipro adds to its string of aquisitions EDS acquires majority of [Read More]

» Rob Parker: Look for Porter to Join Pistons from before being
where he played in college. Porter was coach of the Bucks for two seasons [Read More]

Comments

we're still trying to figure out how to do trackbacks with our new software...wanted to let you know that we linked to this post. ;)

The idea of revamping fuel economy standards so as to encourage larger vehicles, because that will lead to highway safety, seems ... bizarre and wrong-headed. Also, just for pedantry's sake, I believe the proposal gets rid of CAFE and replaces it with several standards for different classes of cars, like the split between cars and light trucks, but moreso.

Oops, my bad. The new standards only apply to the light truck category, which was previously ruled by a single standard. So, that's been splintered into 6 groups, but still doesn't cover the heaviest, hummer-size class of trucks. (According to the Washington Post.)

the new standards do not go far enough, you can see this because there was little opposition from the automotive association about the new rules.Fleet Fuel Economy should be set somewhere around 46.5 MPG and any type of car or sedan should be made to comply with a 36 MPG standard eventually increasing over the years to 46.5 MPG. we as a society know that the automotive industry is capable of increasing fuel economy over the next 7 years more than just 3-4mpg. 10 billion gallons of gas saved over a lifetime of a vehicle is not that much and does nothing to cut fuel costs, or our addiction to oil since our country consumes way more than that each year. if we care about pollution, global warming and the overall costs all americans must pay for fuel, i think we would all support the strictest standards possible in order to create research and development of cleaner more economical vehicles, something that wont be acheived with the new CAFE standards.

The comments to this entry are closed.


Blogads are good for you.

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats





  • View My Stats

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem