Bookmark and Share

Climate Policy in 2009!

Opinion Poll

  • Do you ... "an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions" in 2009?
    strongly support
    somewhat support (I'd strongly support a carbon tax)
    somewhat support (I'm worried about the recession)
    somewhat support (some other reason)
    somewhat do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    somewhat do not support (wait until after the recession)
    somewhat do not support (some other reason)
    strongly do not support (I'd support a carbon tax)
    strongly do not support (wait until after the recession)
    strongly do not support (some other reason)
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

The Answer Desk

  • GOT A QUESTION?
    Got a question about environmental economics? Why do economists like benefit-cost analysis? Tradeable permits? Ask an environmental economist at the Answer Desk.

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2005

« Cost-benefit analysis | Main | Environmental Economics gets a mention from the WSJ »

July 13, 2005

The Oil Drum versus Econbrowser

Here is a comment on Hamilton's economic perspective on oil prices at The Oil Drum. "Heading out" concludes with:

... there are more economists out there who do not understand the true situation, but are willing to go on the talk shows and comment anyway than there are geologists or petroleum engineers that can be either found, or bothered to refute them. And as a result the general public will not be sufficiently warned in time, and will not appreciate the scale of the problem until after it has arrived.

Of course, we at ENV-ECON probably all agree with Hamilton, but the comment is an interesting read.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bd4869e200d83429773253ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Oil Drum versus Econbrowser:

» About that house-price oil-price bubble from disinterested party
I’m definitely sticking to my $40-a-barrel guns: A sudden and mysterious drop in China’s oil consumption helped to push down the International Energy Agency’s estimate on Wednesday of global demand for this year. After growing 11 percent in 2003 and...... [Read More]

Comments

Am I to assume all you at ENV-ECON were made rich by your oil options?

Odograph, Um ... no, bad assumpton. But we do like markets!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blogads

Search


  • Google



Google Ads



Stats





  • View My Stats

WSJ.com: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com

Common Tragedies

Environmental and Urban Economics

Globalisation and the Environment

Knowledge Problem